When turning the data encoder the values change in steps of 2, 3 or even more. This makes it impossible to select values like BPM exactly. I already tried this method:http://www.bourns.com/docs/technical-do ... f?sfvrsn=4 but no change.
Vincent, could you please fix this with a software update?
[SOLVED] Date Encoder is not precise, please fix!
-
Last edited by KlangGenerator on Mar 19th, '18, 21:52, edited 1 time in total.
Solved! For anyone building a Yocto 2 I recommend to delete the encoder that is in the BOM and add this one here:KlangGenerator wrote:When turning the data encoder the values change in steps of 2, 3 or even more. This makes it impossible to select values like BPM exactly. I already tried this method:http://www.bourns.com/docs/technical-do ... f?sfvrsn=4 but no change.
Vincent, could you please fix this with a software update?
https://www.mouser.de/ProductDetail/Bou ... HLRPgvI%3D
The difference is that the one I recommend is non-detented. This is making precise adjustments much easier!
At first, I also thought it's up to that.
But the inputs of the Atmega seem to be able to filter bouncing and noise.
Exactly 4. Which indicates that the software counts every change of potential (4 per step), where it should count only one.
This software problem needs to be fixed with the next update.
Just finished a NAVA. The values change in steps of 1 per detent.
But the inputs of the Atmega seem to be able to filter bouncing and noise.
too preciseKlangGenerator wrote:Date Encoder is not precise, please fix!
When turning the data encoder slowly the values change in steps of 1. But 4 times per detent.KlangGenerator wrote:When turning the data encoder the values change in steps of 2, 3 or even more.
Exactly 4. Which indicates that the software counts every change of potential (4 per step), where it should count only one.
This software problem needs to be fixed with the next update.
Just finished a NAVA. The values change in steps of 1 per detent.